Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Real options and game theoretical approaches to real estate development projects: multiple equilibria and the implications of different tie-breaking rules

[thumbnail of 0910.pdf]
Preview
0910.pdf - Published Version (554kB) | Preview
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Gabrieli, T. and Marcato, G. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6266-4676, (2010) Real options and game theoretical approaches to real estate development projects: multiple equilibria and the implications of different tie-breaking rules. Working Papers in Real Estate & Planning. 09/10. Working Paper. University of Reading, Reading. pp33.

Abstract/Summary

This paper contributes to a fast growing literature which introduces game theory in the analysis of real option investments in a competitive setting. Specifically, in this paper we focus on the issue of multiple equilibria and on the implications that different equilibrium selections may have for the pricing of real options and for subsequent strategic decisions. We present some theoretical results of the necessary conditions to have multiple equilibria and we show under which conditions different tie-breaking rules result in different economic decisions. We then present a numerical exercise using the in formation set obtained on a real estate development in South London. We find that risk aversion reduces option value and this reduction decreases marginally as negative externalities decrease.

Additional Information Game theory and real options, equilibrium selection, real estate development
Item Type Report (Working Paper)
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/26987
Item Type Report
Divisions Henley Business School > Real Estate and Planning
Additional Information Game theory and real options, equilibrium selection, real estate development
Publisher University of Reading
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar