Measuring climate-related and environmental risks for equities

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of Manuscript_RR_Accepted.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Lazar, E. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8761-0754, Pan, J. and Wang, S. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2113-5521 (2025) Measuring climate-related and environmental risks for equities. Journal of Environmental Management, 373. 123393. ISSN 0301-4797 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123393

Abstract/Summary

Financial regulators and investors are increasingly concerned about the effects of climate change on investments and seek to capture the climate-related and environmental risks of investments. Whilst energy companies have attracted most of the attention due to the contribution of the Energy sector to environmental degradation, climate-related and environmental risks actually affect companies in every sector. In this paper, we propose novel measures termed as climate Value-at-Risk (VaR) and climate Expected Shortfall (ES) that capture the risk attributed to transition risk factors proxied by environmental scores. We compare the average ratio of climate VaR and ES to total risk in various equity sectors, which enables us to identify the sectors in which climate and environmental risk factors contribute most to the total risk. Our analysis considers different risk measurements and various significance levels. Our findings show heterogeneity in sensitivity to climate and environmental risk factors in various sectors. The Health Care sector is the least cost-effective in reducing climate-related and environmental risks, and the Energy sector benefits most from improving the firms’ environmental scores.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/119504
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123393
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Economics
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar