Does voluntarism work for the workplace inclusion of individuals with disabilities in a country with limited equality structures?

[thumbnail of PDF_Proof.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Palalar Alkan, D., Kamasak, R. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8768-3569 and Ozbilgin, M. (2024) Does voluntarism work for the workplace inclusion of individuals with disabilities in a country with limited equality structures? Personnel Review. ISSN 0048-3486 doi: 10.1108/PR-01-2024-0041

Abstract/Summary

Purpose - The study explores measures designed explicitly to manage people with disabilities in a context where diversity interventions are incorporated voluntarily. Furthermore, it examines global organizations’ approaches to marginalized groups, such as people with disabilities, in a context where there is an explicit lack of state regulation on diversity measures. Design/methodology/approach - An abductive approach was adopted for the exploratory nature, which sought to understand how global organizations in a developing country utilize diversity management (DM) mechanisms to manage people with disabilities. Findings - The findings reveal that human resources departments of international organizations operating in a neoliberal environment demonstrate two distinct perspectives for individuals with disabilities: (i) inclusiveness due to legal pressures and (ii) social exclusion. Originality/value - We explored global organizations’ approaches to marginalized groups, such as people with disabilities, in the context of an explicit lack of state regulation on diversity measures and showed that the absence of coercive regulation leads to voluntary actions with adverse consequences. The paper expands theories that critique the inclusion of individuals with disabilities in untamed neoliberal contexts and explains how the responsibilization of institutional actors could enhance what is practical and possible for the workplace inclusion of individuals with disabilities. Without such institutional responsibilization, our findings reveal that disability inclusion is left to the limited prospects of the market rationales to the extent of bottom-line utility.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/116827
Identification Number/DOI 10.1108/PR-01-2024-0041
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Leadership, Organisations, Behaviour and Reputation
Publisher Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar