Can one-to-one coaching improve selection success and who benefits most? The role of internship candidate generalised self-efficacy

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of Manuscript anonymous_R1_v2.docx]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Andrews, H. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3745-6779 and Jones, R. J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7329-0502 (2024) Can one-to-one coaching improve selection success and who benefits most? The role of internship candidate generalised self-efficacy. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice. ISSN 1752-1890 doi: 10.1080/17521882.2023.2300799

Abstract/Summary

This study presents a field quasi-experiment to examine whether one-to-one coaching can significantly impact an objective outcome: selection success. Furthermore, we examine whether all participants benefit equally from coaching. We examine whether coaching significantly impacts on selection success (i.e., whether candidates were successfully offered a job role) (N = 357) and whether interactions between coaching and generalised self-efficacy exist (n = 152). Participants were second year undergraduate students in an UK university who were applying for a one year work internship. Our analysis indicates that coaching positively impacted on selection success and specifically, individuals lower in generalised self-efficacy benefitted from coaching. We contribute to the literature on coaching by examining the effectiveness of coaching in relation to an objective outcome. We also advance our understanding of the role of individual differences in coaching by testing the interaction effects for a well-recognised individual difference variable: generalised self-efficacy. Finally, we contribute to the literature regarding the design of career development support in terms of how best to support people based on their individual differences.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/114599
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/17521882.2023.2300799
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Leadership, Organisations, Behaviour and Reputation
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar