Workplace accentism as a postcolonial and intersectional phenomenon: the experiences of Brazilians in Portugal

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Śliwa, M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4547-160X, Aguzzoli, R. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3948-3663, Brewster, C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5314-1518 and Lengler, J. (2023) Workplace accentism as a postcolonial and intersectional phenomenon: the experiences of Brazilians in Portugal. Human Relations. ISSN 1741-282X doi: 10.1177/00187267231198965

Abstract/Summary

What insights can postcolonialism and decoloniality offer into workplace accentism? Drawing upon these two strands of literature, this article contributes to workplace research through proposing a view of accentism as an intersectional phenomenon, rooted in the historically sedimented unequal social structure and relations formed during the colonial past. Based on a qualitative study of Brazilians in Portugal, we identify two forms of workplace accentism experienced by the participants: (1) overt accentism – which involves an explicit, direct reference to a person’s accent; and (2) accent-activated stigmatisation – which occurs upon the listener’s realisation that the speaker is a member of a particular group (specifically, nationality). We theorise the experiences of accentism as contemporary manifestations of the workings of colonial power and prejudices. In addition, we distinguish between four approaches to managing workplace accentism: suppressing, confronting, marginalising and exiting. We theorise these as contemporary expressions of resistance strategies historically used by the colonised in response to colonial power. We also highlight the intersectional differences – along the axes of class, race and gender – with regard to individuals’ deployment of each of these approaches. The article enriches our knowledge about how colonial power relations continue to underpin discrimination and its consequences throughout the global economy.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/113461
Identification Number/DOI 10.1177/00187267231198965
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > International Business and Strategy
Uncontrolled Keywords Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management, General Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Publisher SAGE Publications
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar