Hooker, B. (2022) Should philosophical reflection on ethics do without moral concepts? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 16. ISSN 1572-8447 doi: 10.1007/s10677-022-10303-x
Abstract/Summary
Roger Crisp, in his book Reasons and Goodness, argues in favour of de-moralizing our philosophical reflection on ethics. This paper begins by explaining what ‘de-moralizing’ means. Then the paper assesses Crisp’s argument for de-moralizing and puts forward arguments against de-moralizing.
Altmetric Badge
Item Type | Article |
URI | https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/106612 |
Item Type | Article |
Refereed | Yes |
Divisions | Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy |
Publisher | Springer |
Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
Download Statistics
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Deposit Details
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record