The unintended consequences of the pandemic on non-pandemic research activities

[thumbnail of Manuscript - Unintended consequences of the pandemic RR2 001 240821.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Walker, J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3477-0236, Brewster, C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5314-1518, Fontinha, R. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2390-098X, Haak-Saheem, W., Benigni, S., Lamperti, F. and Ribaudo, D. (2022) The unintended consequences of the pandemic on non-pandemic research activities. Research Policy, 51 (1). 104369. ISSN 0048-7333 doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104369

Abstract/Summary

Research about the Covid-19 pandemic has taken centre stage in shaping the work of many scholars, inter alia highlighting the importance of research in addressing the grand challenges humanity faces. However, the pandemic has also ushered in increased administrative, teaching and out of work commitments for many researchers, leading to concerns that academics will become less willing to invest time in obtaining resources to undertake non-Covid-related projects. Using a large-scale survey of business, economics and management researchers, coupled with their publication histories and additional institutional data, we examine how far individuals experienced the focus on the pandemic as ‘crowding out’ interest in, and undermining their confidence in applying for grants for work not focused on the pandemic. We found 40% of the sample agree that the pandemic has impaired their confidence in applying for non-pandemic-related grants and ‘crowded out’ other projects. Researchers with current and prior grants, particularly those with the most experience of holding grants, scholars whose work ‘impacted’ beyond academia, and early career researchers, disproportionately considered themselves to be most affected. We also found that researchers’ perceptions differed based on institutional characteristics. We discuss the implications of these findings for grant providers and national research agencies as well as for individual academic researchers and the institutions in which they work.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/100140
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104369
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > International Business and Strategy
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar