Mastery of one’s domain is not the essence of management

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Sinnicks, M. (2014) Mastery of one’s domain is not the essence of management. Business Ethics Journal Review, 2 (2). pp. 8-14. ISSN 2326-7526 doi: 10.12747/bejr2014.02.02

Abstract/Summary

I attempt to cast doubt on Beabout’s attempt to build on MacIntyre’s ethical theory by accounting for management as a ‘domain-relative’ practice for three reasons: i) we can partially engage in practices, so if management can be accounted a practice there is no need to invoke domain-relativity; ii) management does not seem to be domain-relative in the same way that other examples of domain-relative practices might be; and iii) practical wisdom, which Beabout sees as key to management as a domain-relative practice, is adequately covered by MacIntyre’s account of politics.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/99736
Identification Number/DOI 10.12747/bejr2014.02.02
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Leadership, Organisations and Behaviour
Publisher Philosophy Documentation Center
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar