Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

'Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous': primary school girls' and parents' constructions of science aspirations

Full text not archived in this repository.
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B. and Wong, B. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7310-6418 (2013) 'Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous': primary school girls' and parents' constructions of science aspirations. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 21 (1). pp. 171-194. ISSN 1468-1366 doi: 10.1080/14681366.2012.748676

Abstract/Summary

Internationally, there is widespread concern about the need to increase participation in the sciences (particularly the physical sciences), especially among girls/women. This paper draws on data from a five-year, longitudinal study of 10–14-year-old children’s science aspirations and career choice to explore the reasons why, even from a young age, many girls may see science aspirations as ‘not for me’. We discuss data from phase one – a survey of over 9000 primary school children (aged 10/11) and interviews with 92 children and 78 parents, focusing in particular on those girls who did not hold science aspirations. Using a feminist poststructuralist analytic lens, we argue that science aspirations are largely ‘unthinkable’ for these girls because they do not fit with either their constructions of desirable/intelligible femininity nor with their sense of themselves as learners/students. We argue that an underpinning construction of science careers as ‘clever’/‘brainy’, ‘not nurturing’ and ‘geeky’ sits in opposition to the girls’ self-identifications as ‘normal’, ‘girly’, ‘caring’ and ‘active’. Moreover, we suggest that this lack of fit is exacerbated by social inequalities, which render science aspirations potentially less thinkable for working-class girls in particular. The paper concludes with a discussion of potential implications for increasing women’s greater participation in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics).

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/99174
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Arts, Humanities and Social Science > Institute of Education > Improving Equity and Inclusion through Education
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar