Justifying reverse burdens of proof: a tale of diminished responsibility and a tangled knot of authorities

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Coe, P. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6036-4127 (2013) Justifying reverse burdens of proof: a tale of diminished responsibility and a tangled knot of authorities. Journal of Criminal Law, 77 (5). pp. 360-365. ISSN 1740-5580 doi: 10.1350/jcla.2013.77.5.860

Abstract/Summary

This case comment provides detailed commentary of R. v Foye (Lee Robert) [2013] EWCA Crim 475; (2013) 177 J.P. 449 (CA (Crim Div)) and, in particular, the reverse burden of proof imposed by s. 2(2) of the Homicide 1957 Act and its compatibility with Article 6(2) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/98322
Identification Number/DOI 10.1350/jcla.2013.77.5.860
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher SAGE
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar