Composited structure of non-precipitating shallow cumulus clouds

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of Gu_etal_2021_Composited_Structure_of_Non_precipitating_shallow_cumulus_clouds.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Gu, J.-F. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7752-4553, Plant, R. S. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8808-0022, Holloway, C. E. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9903-8989 and Jones, T. R. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7669-1499 (2021) Composited structure of non-precipitating shallow cumulus clouds. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 147 (738). pp. 2818-2833. ISSN 1477-870X doi: 10.1002/qj.4101

Abstract/Summary

The normalized distributions of thermodynamic and dynamical variables both within and outside shallow clouds are investigated through a composite algorithm using large eddy simulations of oceanic and continental cases. The normalized magnitude is maximum near cloud center and decreases outwards. While relative humidity (RH) and cloud liquid water ($q_l$) decrease smoothly to match the environment, the vertical velocity, virtual potential temperature ($\theta_v$) and potential temperature ($\theta$) perturbations have more complicated behaviour towards the cloud boundary. Below the inversion layer, $\theta_v^{'}$ becomes negative before the vertical velocity has turned from updraft to subsiding shell outside the cloud, indicating the presence of a transition zone where the updraft is negatively buoyant. Due to the downdraft outside the cloud and the enhanced horizontal turbulent mixing across the edge, the normalized turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) and horizontal turbulence kinetic energy (HTKE) decrease more slowly from the cloud center outwards than the thermodynamic variables. The distributions all present asymmetric structures in response to the vertical wind shear, with more negatively buoyant air, stronger downdrafts and larger TKE on the downshear side. We discuss several implications of the distributions for theoretical models and parameterizations. Positive buoyancy near cloud base is mostly due to the virtual effect of water vapor, emphasising the role of moisture in triggering. The mean vertical velocity is found to be approximately half the maximum vertical velocity within each cloud, providing a constraint to achieve possible power law distributions for some models. Finally, the normalized distributions for different variables are used to estimate the vertical heat and moisture fluxes within clouds. The results suggest the distributions near cloud edge and the variability of maximum perturbations need careful treatment. The fluxes are underestimated in the inversion layer because the cloud top downdrafts can not be well captured.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/98075
Identification Number/DOI 10.1002/qj.4101
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
Publisher Royal Meteorological Society
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar