Risk aversion in a performativity culture – what can we learn from teachers’ curriculum decision making in history?

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of Risk aversion_JCS_not for review_final_modified working version .pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Harris, R. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8606-5515 (2021) Risk aversion in a performativity culture – what can we learn from teachers’ curriculum decision making in history? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53 (5). pp. 659-674. ISSN 1366-5839 doi: 10.1080/00220272.2021.1884294

Abstract/Summary

Using the notion of risk aversion, this study explores the decisions teachers make when constructing a curriculum. Adopting a qualitative, grounded approach, this study used semi-structured interviews with nine history teachers to examine the decisions they were making during a period of considerable curriculum change in England. Five key categories were identified, which were then defined as risk averse or high risk. The findings show that teachers largely adopt a low risk approach when constructing a curriculum. In particular choice of content, pedagogical and assessment approaches are affected. Also, changes to the curriculum in high stakes examination courses have a major distorting impact on the curriculum choices for the phase of schooling prior to the examination course. This study would suggest that teachers generally aim to maximise examination outcomes through adopting a low risk approach to curriculum change. However, according to the literature, these low risk approaches appear unlikely to improve examination outcomes, whilst at the same time narrowing students’ experience of the curriculum.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/95885
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/00220272.2021.1884294
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > Institute of Education > Improving Equity and Inclusion through Education
Uncontrolled Keywords risk taking; risk aversion; teachers’ decision-making; curriculum; curriculum construction
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar