Bayesian decision procedures for dose-escalation based on evidence of undesirable events and therapeutic benefit.

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Whitehead, J., Zhou, Y., Stevens, J., Blakey, G., Price, J. and Leadbetter, J. (2006) Bayesian decision procedures for dose-escalation based on evidence of undesirable events and therapeutic benefit. Statistics in Medicine, 25 (1). pp. 37-53. ISSN 0277-6715 doi: 10.1002/sim.2201

Abstract/Summary

In this paper, Bayesian decision procedures are developed for dose-escalation studies based on bivariate observations of undesirable events and signs of therapeutic benefit. The methods generalize earlier approaches taking into account only the undesirable outcomes. Logistic regression models are used to model the two responses, which are both assumed to take a binary form. A prior distribution for the unknown model parameters is suggested and an optional safety constraint can be included. Gain functions to be maximized are formulated in terms of accurate estimation of the limits of a therapeutic window or optimal treatment of the next cohort of subjects, although the approach could be applied to achieve any of a wide variety of objectives. The designs introduced are illustrated through simulation and retrospective implementation to a completed dose-escalation study. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/9434
Identification Number/DOI 10.1002/sim.2201
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Mathematics and Statistics > Applied Statistics
Uncontrolled Keywords Bayesian decision procedure , continual reassessment method , dose-escalation , logistic regression , phase I clinical trial
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar