Valorisation of natural resources and the need for economic and sustainability sssessment: the case of cocoa pod husk in Indonesia

Downloads

1. Babulo, B.; Muys, B.; Nega, F.; Tollens, E.; Nyssen, J.; Deckers, J.; Mathijs, E. Household livelihood strat-egies and forest dependence in the highlands of Tigray, Northern Ethiopiao. Agric. Syst. 2008, 98, 147–155. 2. Cavendish, W. Empirical regularities in the poverty–environment relationship of rural households: Evidence from Zimbabwe. World Dev. 2000, 28, 1979–2003. 3. Davis, B.; Winters, P.; Carletto, G.; Covarrubias, K.; Quin ̃ones, E.J.; Zezza, A.; Digiuseppe, S. A cross-country comparison of rural income generating activities. World Development, 38, 48–63. World Dev. 2010, 38, 48–63. 4. Ellis, F. Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. J. Dev. Stud. 1998, 35, 1–38. 5. de Sherbinin, A.; VanWey, L.K.; McSweeney, K.; Aggarwal, R.; Barbieri, A.; Henry, S.; Hunter, L.M.; Twine, W.; Walker, R. Rural household demographics, livelihoods and the environment. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2008, 18, 38–53, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.05.005. 6. Garcia-Garcia, G.; Stone, J.; Rahimifard, S. Opportunities for waste valorisation in the food industry – A case study with four UK food manufacturers. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 211, 1339–1356, doi:10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.11.269. 7. IES Feeding the nine billion; 2017. 8. Nasirumbi Sanya, L.; Birungi Kyazze, F.; Sseguya, H.; Kibwika, P.; Baguma, Y. Complexity of agricul-tural technology development processes: Implications for uptake of new hybrid banana varieties in Central Uganda. Cogent Food Agric. 2017, 3, 1–18, doi:10.1080/23311932.2017.1419789. 9. Fei, L.; Rodriguez-Garcia, Julia Van Damme, I.; Westwood Nicholas J., Shaw, L.; Robinson, James S. Warren, G.; Chatzifragkou, Afroditi McQueen Mason, S.; Gomez, L.; Faas, L.; Balcombe, K.; Srinivasan, C.; Picchioni, F.; et al. Valorisation strategies for cocoa pod husk and its fractions. Green Sustain. Chem. 2018, 14, 80–88, doi:10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.07.007. 10. Garb, Y.; Friedlander, L. From transfer to translation: Using systemic understandings of technology to understand drip irrigation uptake. Agric. Syst. 2014, 128, 13–24, doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2014.04.003. 11. Hartemink, A.E. Nutrient Stocks, Nutrient Cycling, and Soil Changes in Cocoa Ecosystems: A Review. Adv. Agron. 2005, 86, 227–253. 12. van Vliet, J.A.; Giller, K.E. Mineral Nutrition of Cocoa: A Review. Adv. Agron. 2017, 141, 185–270, doi:10.1016/BS.AGRON.2016.10.017. 13. Turmel, M.S.; Speratti, A.; Baudron, F.; Verhulst, N.; Govaerts, B. Crop residue management and soil health: A systems analysis. Agric. Syst. 2015, 134, 6–16, doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2014.05.009. 14. Fontes, A.G.; Gama-Rodrigues, A.C.; Gama-Rodrigues, E.F.; Sales, M.V.S.; Costa, M.G.; Machado, R.C.R. Nutrient stocks in litterfall and litter in cocoa agroforests in Brazil. Plant. Soil 2014, 383, 313–335, doi:10.1007/s11104-014-2175-9. 15. FAO Cocoa production statistics Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home (accessed on Apr 21, 2019). 16. Witjaksono, J. Cocoa Farming System in Indonesia and Its Sustainability Under Climate Change. Agric. For. Fish. 2016, 5, 170, doi:10.11648/j.aff.20160505.15. 17. Hoffmann, M.P.; Cock, J.; Samson, M.; Janetski, N.; Janetski, K.; Rötter, R.P.; Fisher, M.; Oberthür, T. Fer-tilizer management in smallholder cocoa farms of Indonesia under variable climate and market prices. Agric. Syst. 2020, 178, 102759, doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102759. 18. Wood, G.A..; Lass, R.A. Cocoa; 4th Editio.; Longman: London, 1986;. 19. Hertel, D.; Harteveld, M.A.; Leuschner, C. Conversion of a tropical forest into agroforest alters the fine root-related carbon flux to the soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2009, 41, 481–490, doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.11.020. 20. Sokol, N.W.; Kuebbing, S.E.; Karlsen-Ayala, E.; Bradford, M.A. Evidence for the primacy of living root inputs, not root or shoot litter, in forming soil organic carbon. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 233–246, doi:10.1111/nph.15361. 21. Xu, S.; Liu, L.L.; Sayer, E.J. Variability of above-ground litter inputs alters soil physicochemical and bio-logical processes: A meta-analysis of litterfall-manipulation experiments. Biogeosciences 2013, 10, 7423–7433, doi:10.5194/bg-10-7423-2013. 22. Leff, J.W.; Wieder, W.R.; Taylor, P.G.; Townsend, A.R.; Nemergut, D.R.; Grandy, A.S.; Cleveland, C.C. Experimental litterfall manipulation drives large and rapid changes in soil carbon cycling in a wet trop-ical forest. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2012, 18, 2969–2979, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02749.x. 23. Dawoe, E.K.; Isaac, M.E.; Quashie-Sam, J. Litterfall and litter nutrient dynamics under cocoa ecosystems in lowland humid Ghana. Palnt Soil 2010, 330, 55–64, doi:10.1007/s11104-009-0173-0. 24. Tondoh, J.E.; Kouamé, F.N. guessa.; Martinez Guéi, A.; Sey, B.; Wowo Koné, A.; Gnessougou, N. Ecolog-ical changes induced by full-sun cocoa farming in CÔte d’Ivoire. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2015, 3, 575–595, doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2015.02.007. 25. Veldkamp, E.; Purbopuspito, J.; Corre, M.D.; Brumme, R.; and Murdiyarso, D. Land use change effects on trace gas fluxes in the forest margins of Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. J. Geophys. Res. 2008, 113. 26. Köhler, S.; Jungkunst, H.F.; Gutzler, C.; Herrera, R.; Gerold, G. Atmospheric ionic deposition in tropical sites of central sulawesi determined by ion exchange resin collectors and bulk water collector. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 2012, 223, 4485–4494, doi:10.1007/s11270-012-1211-8. 27. Petry, J.F.; Sebastião, S.A.; Martins, E.G.; Barros, P.B. de A. Innovation and the Diffusion of Technology in Agriculture in Floodplains in the State of Amazonas. RAC - Rev. Adm. Contemp. (Journal Contemp. Adm. 2019, 23, 619–635. 28. Hall, A.; Bockett, G.; Taylor, S.; Sivamohan, M.V..; Clark, N. Why Research Partnerships Really Matter: Innovation Theory, Institutional Arrangements and Implications for Developing New Technology for the Poor. World Dev. 2001, 29, 783–797, doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00004-3. 29. Klerkx, L.; Leeuwis, C. Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: Insights from the Dutch agricultural sector. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2009, 76, 849–860, doi:10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2008.10.001. 30. van Mierlo, B.; Leeuwis, C.; Smits, R.; Woolthuis, R.K. Learning towards system innovation: Evaluating a systemic instrument. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2010, 77, 318–334, doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2009.08.004. 31. Pigford, A.A.E.; Hickey, G.M.; Klerkx, L. Beyond agricultural innovation systems? Exploring an agricul-tural innovation ecosystems approach for niche design and development in sustainability transitions. Agric. Syst. 2018, 164, 116–121, doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2018.04.007.