Can high quality listening predict lower speakers' prejudiced attitudes?

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Itchakov, G., Weinstein, N. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2200-6617, Legate, N. and Amar, M. (2020) Can high quality listening predict lower speakers' prejudiced attitudes? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 91. 104022. ISSN 0022-1031 doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104022

Abstract/Summary

Theorizing from humanistic and motivational literatures suggests attitude change may occur because high quality listening facilitates the insight needed to explore and integrate potentially threatening information re- levant to the self. By extension, self-insight may enable attitude change as a result of conversations about pre- judice. We tested whether high quality listening would predict attitudes related to speakers' prejudices and whether self-insight would mediate this effect. Study 1 (preregistered) examined scripted conversations char- acterized by high, regular, and poor listening quality. In Study 2, we manipulated high versus regular listening quality in the laboratory as speakers talked about their prejudiced attitudes. Finally, Study 3 (preregistered) used a more robust measure of prejudiced attitudes to test whether perceived social acceptance could be an alter- native explanation to Study 2 findings. Across these studies, the exploratory (pilot study and Study 2) and confirmatory (Studies 1 & 3) findings were in line with expectations that high, versus regular and poor, quality listening facilitated lower prejudiced attitudes because it increased self-insight. A meta-analysis of the studies (N = 952) showed that the average effect sizes for high quality listening (vs. comparison conditions) on self- insight, openness to change and prejudiced attitudes were, ds = 1.19, 0.46, 0.32 95%CIs [0.73, 1.51], [0.29, 0.63] [0.12, 0.53], respectively. These results suggest that when having conversations about prejudice, high- quality listening modestly shapes prejudice following conversations about it, and underscore the importance of self-insight and openness to change in this process.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/93645
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104022
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Social
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar