Balance in the golden bowl: attuning philosophy and literary criticism

[thumbnail of 05Oct2020Balance in the Golden Bowl (MdeG Paper).pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

De Gaynesford, M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2715-6342 (2022) Balance in the golden bowl: attuning philosophy and literary criticism. In: Conant, J. and Chakraborty, S. (eds.) Engaging Putnam. Berlin Studies in Knowledge Research (17). De Gruyter, pp. 309-331. ISBN 9783110769166 doi: 10.1515/9783110769210-014

Abstract/Summary

This paper argues that Henry James’ treatment of balancing in The Golden Bowl—to which Putnam insightfully draws attention—calls for the attunement of philosophy and literary criticism. The process may undermine Putnam’s own reading of the novel, but it also finds new reasons to endorse what his reading was meant to deliver: the confidence that philosophy and thoughtful appreciation of literature have much to contribute to each other, and the conviction that morality can incorporate (Kantian) seriousness about rules alongside (Aristotelian) sensitivity to character and situation

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Book or Report Section
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/93066
Identification Number/DOI 10.1515/9783110769210-014
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy
Publisher De Gruyter
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar