Tiffin, R. (2004) Shrinking the posterior: A note on the Nerlovian model. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55 (1). pp. 115-121. ISSN 0021-857X doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2004.tb00083.x
Abstract/Summary
Diebold and Lamb (1997) argue that since the long-run elasticity of supply derived from the Nerlovian model entails a ratio of random variables, it is without moments. They propose minimum expected loss estimation to correct this problem but in so-doing ignore the fact that a non white-noise-error is implicit in the model. We show that, as a consequence the estimator is biased and demonstrate that Bayesian estimation which fully accounts for the error structure is preferable.
Altmetric Badge
Item Type | Article |
URI | https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/9276 |
Item Type | Article |
Refereed | Yes |
Divisions | Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development |
Uncontrolled Keywords | AGRICULTURAL SUPPLY RESPONSE, DYNAMICS |
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell |
Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record