Dirty tariffication revisited: The EU and sugar

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Swinbank, A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2526-2026 (2004) Dirty tariffication revisited: The EU and sugar. The Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, 5 (1). pp. 56-69.

Abstract/Summary

It is widely believed that a number of countries, including the EU, engaged in dirty tariffication during the Uruguay Round of trade talks. This article examines the EU’s record on sugar and finds little evidence to substantiate the claim. However, world prices increased between the base period (1986-88) and the date of implementation (1995), and so tariffication resulted in an increase in the tax that would have been charged on sugar imports into the EU. As well, the Special Safeguard provisions meant that a substantial additional levy could be charged.

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/9239
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development
Uncontrolled Keywords agriculture, EU, sugar, tariffication, trade, International Relations/Trade
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar