Felgenhauer, M. and Xu, F.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3489-6824
(2021)
The face value of arguments with and without manipulation.
International Economic Review, 62 (1).
pp. 277-293.
ISSN 0020-6598
doi: 10.1111/iere.12479
Abstract/Summary
A sender wishes to persuade a receiver with a (surprising) result that challenges the prior belief. The result stems either from sequential private experimentation or manipulation. The incentive to experiment and to manipulate depends on the quality threshold for persuasion. Higher thresholds make it harder to find a surprising outcome via experimentation and may encourage manipulation. Suppose there are observable non-manipulable and manipulable research methods. For the decision quality, the quality threshold for persuasion for non-manipulable methods should be higher than for manipulable methods. We discuss philosophy of science implications, such as field contingent quality standards and P-value adjustments.
Altmetric Badge
| Item Type | Article |
| URI | https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/92336 |
| Identification Number/DOI | 10.1111/iere.12479 |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Divisions | Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Economics |
| Publisher | Wiley |
| Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record
Download
Download