2014 code of practice: how research evidence on the role and impact of teaching assistants can inform professional practice

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Webster, R. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1416-4439 (2014) 2014 code of practice: how research evidence on the role and impact of teaching assistants can inform professional practice. Educational Psychology in Practice, 30 (3). pp. 232-237. ISSN 1469-5839 doi: 10.1080/02667363.2014.917401

Abstract/Summary

In this article, the author reflects on findings from research on the role and impact of teaching assistants and experience of working as a special educational needs (SEN) officer. Research evidence suggests the reliance on teaching assistants to include pupils with Statements of SEN in mainstream settings masks a collective, though unintentional, failure of educationalists to articulate and provide schools and families of children with SEN with appropriate and pedagogically sound models of inclusive provision. In light of the forthcoming reforms to the SEN system in England, key implications for educational psychologists (EPs) are drawn out, with particular reference to their role in parent liaison during the statutory assessment process.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/92028
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/02667363.2014.917401
Refereed Yes
Divisions No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Publisher Routledge
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar