The impact of green facades and vegetative cover on the temperature and relative humidity within model buildings

[thumbnail of The impact of green facades and vegetative cover on the temperature and relative humidity within model buildings.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Thomsit-Ireland, F., Essah, E. A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1349-5167, Hadley, P. and Blanuša, T. (2020) The impact of green facades and vegetative cover on the temperature and relative humidity within model buildings. Building and Environment, 181. 107009. ISSN 0360-1323 doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107009

Abstract/Summary

Vertical greening solutions such as direct greening are gaining popularity due to their relatively low cost and minimal ground footprint. However, concerns about increases in relative humidity (RH) can reduce implementation. The impact of several widely-used plant species (Hedera helix, Parthenocissus tricuspidata and Pileostegia viburnoides) on the internal/external temperature and RH on the south-facing wall of replicated experimental model ‘buildings’ was studied during summer and winter. All plant species reduced the air temperature internally/externally during the summer daytimes by at least 1 oC compared to bare ‘buildings’. Hedera produced the greatest cooling effect internally and externally, by 7.2 oC and 5.7 oC respectively. All plant species reduced daily variation in external RH and external/internal temperature during summer; Hedera reduced variation most and Pileostegia least. During night-time in both seasons, the temperature behind Hedera foliage typically remained higher, which could reduce the risk of freeze-thaw damage in winter. The RH was not significantly elevated by vegetation except during warm afternoons in summer and winter. During warm afternoons, the external RH was significantly higher only behind the Hedera foliage compared to the bare ‘buildings’, 11% and 3.7% , summer and winter respectively. However, inside all vegetated ‘buildings’ the RH was at least 11% higher compared to the bare ‘buildings’ during summer. Yet, in winter the internal RH was 5.7% lower in the Hedera-covered compared to the bare ‘buildings’. Current building standards would prevent the transfer of external RH in this range internally, as the walls include protective layers such as damp-proof membranes.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/91882
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107009
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Crop Science
Science > School of the Built Environment > Energy and Environmental Engineering group
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar