The impact of two arable field margin management schemes on litter decomposition

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Smith, J., Potts, S. G. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2045-980X, Woodcock, B. A. and Eggleton, P. (2009) The impact of two arable field margin management schemes on litter decomposition. Applied Soil Ecology, 41 (1). pp. 90-97. ISSN 0929-1393 doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.09.003

Abstract/Summary

A primary objective of agri-environment schemes is the conservation of biodiversity; in addition to increasing the value of farmland for wildlife, these schemes also aim to restore natural ecosystem functioning. The management of scheme options can influence their value for delivering ecosystem services by modifying the composition of floral and faunal communities. This study examines the impact of an agri-environment scheme prescription on ecosystem functioning by testing the hypothesis that vegetation management influences decomposition rates in grassy arable field margins. The effects of two vegetation management practices in arable field margins - cutting and soil disturbance (scarification) - on litter decomposition were compared using a litterbag experimental approach in early April 2006. Bags had either small mesh designed to restrict access to soil macrofauna, or large mesh that would allow macrofauna to enter. Bags were positioned on the soil surface or inserted into the soil in cut and scarified margins, retrieved after 44, 103 and 250 days and the amount of litter mass remaining was calculated. Litter loss from the litterbags with large mesh was greater than from the small mesh bags, providing evidence that soil macrofauna accelerate rates of litter decomposition. In the large mesh bags, the proportion of litter remaining in bags above and belowground in the cut plots was similar, while in the scarified plots, there was significantly more litter left in the aboveground bags than in the belowground bags. This loss of balance between decomposition rates above and belowground in scarified margins may have implications for the development and maintenance of grassy arable field margins by influencing nutrient availability for plant communities. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/9186
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.09.003
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development
Interdisciplinary centres and themes > Soil Research Centre
Uncontrolled Keywords Decomposition, Litter-bags, Soil macrofauna, Vegetation management, Agri-environment schemes, agri-environment schemes, leaf-litter, soil invertebrates, biodiversity, agroecosystems, mineralization, conservation, strategies, dynamics, nitrogen
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar