The case for feminist legal history

[thumbnail of FLH_FINAL_Feb2020.pdf]
Preview
Text
- Accepted Version

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Rackley, E. and Auchmuty, R. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0792-3978 (2020) The case for feminist legal history. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 40 (4). pp. 878-904. ISSN 0143-6503 doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqaa023

Abstract/Summary

While we may be witnessing a highpoint of interest in the lives of early women lawyers, and women’s legal history generally, feminist legal history remains largely undeveloped in the UK. Drawing on examples of women’s representation in and engagement with law and law reform in the UK and Ireland, this article delineates the method, scope and purpose of feminist legal history. It begins by exploring the place of women in traditional accounts of legal history, before going on to consider the methodological and substantive goals of feminist legal history. We argue that feminist legal history is a political project, requiring its authors to commit not only to uncovering untold stories but to challenging and revising dominant historical narratives. We conclude with a call for scholars to take up the insights and methods of feminist legal history as a means of acknowledging and celebrating the agency of those involved in past and ongoing struggles for justice and equality.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/91210
Identification Number/DOI 10.1093/ojls/gqaa023
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Oxford University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar