Mixed Logit Model Performance and Distributional Assumptions: Preferences and GM foods

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Rigby, D., Balcombe, K. and Burton, M. (2009) Mixed Logit Model Performance and Distributional Assumptions: Preferences and GM foods. Environmental & Resource Economics, 42 (3). pp. 279-295. ISSN 0924-6460 doi: 10.1007/s10640-008-9227-7

Abstract/Summary

Using mixed logit models to analyse choice data is common but requires ex ante specification of the functional forms of preference distributions. We make the case for greater use of bounded functional forms and propose the use of the Marginal Likelihood, calculated using Bayesian techniques, as a single measure of model performance across non nested mixed logit specifications. Using this measure leads to very different rankings of model specifications compared to alternative rule of thumb measures. The approach is illustrated using data from a choice experiment regarding GM food types which provides insights regarding the recent WTO dispute between the EU and the US, Canada and Argentina and whether labelling and trade regimes should be based on the production process or product composition.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/9112
Identification Number/DOI 10.1007/s10640-008-9227-7
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development
Uncontrolled Keywords Mixed logit, Bayesian, GM, Marginal likelihood, WTO, choice
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar