Phenomenalism, or neutral monism, in Mach’s analysis of sensations?

[thumbnail of 12. Preston - Phenomenalism or Monism in AS (1).pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Preston, J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3740-2308 (2021) Phenomenalism, or neutral monism, in Mach’s analysis of sensations? In: Preston, J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3740-2308 (ed.) Interpreting Ernst Mach: Critical Essays. Interpreting. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. ISBN 9781108474016

Abstract/Summary

I set out the factors which tempt people into reading Ernst Mach's book The Analysis of Sensations as putting forward either a version of phenomenalism or a version of neutral monism, and then assess the strengths and weaknesses of these two readings. I present an ‘internal’ view of that text, showing that it by no means mandates the phenomenalist reading, and that a case for something more like the neutral monist reading can be made from within that book, indeed largely from within its famous first chapter.

Item Type Book or Report Section
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/90946
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar