Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

A sensitivity analysis of the PAWN sensitivity index

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
1-s2.0-S1364815219306607-main.pdf - Published Version (889kB) | Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Puy, A., Lo Piano, S. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2625-483X and Saltelli, A. (2020) A sensitivity analysis of the PAWN sensitivity index. Environmental Modelling & Software, 127. 104679. ISSN 1364-8152 doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104679

Abstract/Summary

The PAWN index is gaining traction among the modelling community as a sensitivity measure. However, the robustness to its design parameters has not yet been scrutinized: the size (N) and sampling (ε) of the model output, the number of conditioning intervals (n) or the summary statistic (θ). Here we fill this gap by running a sensitivity analysis of a PAWN-based sensitivity analysis. We compare the results with the design uncertainties of the Sobol’ total-order index (S*Ti). Unlike in S*Ti, the design uncertainties in PAWN create non-negligible chances of producing biased results when ranking or screening inputs. The dependence of PAWN upon (N, n, ε, θ) is difficult to tame, as these parameters interact with one another. Even in an ideal setting in which the optimum choice for (N, n, ε, θ) is known in advance, PAWN might not allow to distinguish an influential, non-additive model input from a truly non-influential model input.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/90445
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of the Built Environment > Energy and Environmental Engineering group
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar