When is a MAX not the MAX? How news resolves information uncertainty

[thumbnail of full_paper.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Tao, R., Brooks, C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2668-1153 and Bell, A. R. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4531-0072 (2020) When is a MAX not the MAX? How news resolves information uncertainty. Journal of Empirical Finance, 57. pp. 33-51. ISSN 0927-5398 doi: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2020.03.002

Abstract/Summary

A well-known asset pricing anomaly, the “MAX” effect, measured by the maximum daily return in the past month, depicts stocks’ lottery-like features and investor gambling behaviour. Using the comprehensive stock-level Dow Jones (DJNS) news database between 1979 and 2016, we consider in a empirical setting how the presence of news reports affects these lottery-type stocks. We find an augmented negative relationship between MAX stocks without news and expected returns, whereby MAX with news coverage generates return momentum. The differing future return relationships between MAX stocks with and without news appears to be best explained by information uncertainty mitigation upon news arrival. Overall, our findings suggest that news plays a role in resolving information uncertainty in the stock market.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/89795
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.jempfin.2020.03.002
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar