Taking back control

[thumbnail of Taking Back Control, CRISPP, 01.03.20.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Jubb, R. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0956-4000 (2023) Taking back control. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 26 (2). pp. 159-180. ISSN 1743-8772 doi: 10.1080/13698230.2020.1738067

Abstract/Summary

Contemporary egalitarian political philosophy has become increasingly interested in the ways the international order may protect or undermine states’ capacities to deliver domestic egalitarianism. Yet it has not always thought through the complexity or dynamism of interactions between domestic and international politics. These problems can be usefully understood through the problematic the intellectual historian István Hont called jealousy of trade and used to understand eighteenth century European political and philosophical debates. Isaac Nakhimovsky’s work on Johann Gottlieb Fichte’s closed commercial state is particularly helpful given the similarity of some of Fichte’s commitments to those of contemporary internationalising egalitarians.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/89495
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/13698230.2020.1738067
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Politics and International Relations
Publisher Routledge
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar