The thesis of "doux commerce" and the social licence to operate framework

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Borg, E. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2725-9568 (2021) The thesis of "doux commerce" and the social licence to operate framework. Business Ethics: A European Review, 30 (3). pp. 412-422. ISSN 1467-8608 doi: 10.1111/beer.12279

Abstract/Summary

The "doux commerce" thesis holds that commerce acts as a civilising force, contributing to the advancement and well-being of societies by inculcating certain core moral values in individuals (such as honesty, tolerance and fair-dealing). This idea has a venerable history. However, I suggest that it faces a particular challenge in the current era in light of examples of systemic misbehaviour by global companies. This paper explores the nature of this challenge, taking the events around the financial crisis of 2007-8 as a case study, and suggests that if we are to preserve the idea that commerce contributes to the common good then greater mechanisms of constraint on the worst excesses of business behaviour will be needed. In particular, I argue that we must recognise the need for all firms to have a social purpose and suggest that the ‘social licence to operate’ framework, familiar from the mining and extraction sectors, could be used to provide crucial leverage on the behaviour of multinational firms.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/89365
Identification Number/DOI 10.1111/beer.12279
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar