No action without talk? UN peacekeeping, discourse, and institutional self-legitimation

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of UN Peacekeeping, Discourse, and Self-Legitimation REV2.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

von Billerbeck, S. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0154-1944 (2020) No action without talk? UN peacekeeping, discourse, and institutional self-legitimation. Review of International Studies, 46 (4). pp. 477-494. ISSN 0260-2105 doi: 10.1017/S026021052000011X

Abstract/Summary

In this article, I argue that much of the discourse observable within the UN constitutes neither unnecessary and unproductive ‘talk’ nor efforts to convince outside audiences of its legitimacy, but actually a form of institutional self-legitimation that is key to its ability to function. Using the case of the UN’s Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), I show that because the organization has a multifaceted organizational identity, it faces situations where it is forced to choose between multiple but equally appropriate courses of action, and it uses self-legitimation alongside other mechanisms to overcome these tensions. I specify three sets of circumstances in which this occurs, showing how DPKO uses discourse that simplifies and exceptionalizes in a bid to reconcile or downplay these contradictions and reassert a cohesive and legitimate organizational identity internally. This simplification and exceptionalization in turn serve an enabling function, allowing DPKO to continue operating in conditions of complexity by decreasing risk aversion and instilling a deep sense of professional loyalty in staff. At the same time, such discursive processes are costly and may entrench inefficient practices, rendering the effects of self-legitimizing discourse paradoxical: they may enable action, but they reduce the efficiency and effectiveness of that action.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/89258
Identification Number/DOI 10.1017/S026021052000011X
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Politics and International Relations
Uncontrolled Keywords United Nations, legitimacy, self-legitimation, discourse, peacekeeping
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar