Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Quantifying the health burden misclassification from the use of different PM2.5 exposure tier models: A case study of London

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
ijerph-17-01099 (1).pdf - Published Version (3MB) | Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of Vasilis_2020_ijerph.pdf]
Vasilis_2020_ijerph.pdf - Accepted Version (1MB)
Restricted to Repository staff only
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Kazakos, V., Luo, Z. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2082-3958 and Ewart, I. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9502-2338 (2020) Quantifying the health burden misclassification from the use of different PM2.5 exposure tier models: A case study of London. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (3). 1099. ISSN 1660-4601 doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031099

Abstract/Summary

Exposure to PM2.5 has been associated with increased mortality in urban areas. Hence, reducing the uncertainty in human exposure assessments is essential for more accurate health burden estimates. Here we quantify the misclassification that occurs when using different exposure approaches to predict the mortality burden of a population using London as a case study. We develop a framework for quantifying the misclassification of the total mortality burden attributable to exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in four major microenvironments (MEs) (dwellings, aboveground transportation, London Underground (LU) and outdoors)in the Greater London Area (GLA), in 2017. We demonstrate that differences exist between five different exposure Tier-models with incrementally increasing complexity, moving from static to more dynamic approaches. BenMap-CE, the open source software developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, is used as a tool to achieve spatial distribution of the ambient concentration by interpolating the monitoring data to the unmonitored areas and ultimately estimate the change in mortality on a fine resolution. Our results showed that using the outdoor concentration as a surrogate for the total population exposure but ignoring the different exposure concentration that occurs indoors and the time spent in transit, would lead to a misclassification of 1,174 predicted mortalities in GLA. Indoor exposure to PM2.5 is the largest contributor to total population exposure, accounting for 80% of total mortality, followed by the London Underground which contributes 15%, albeit the average percentage of time spent there by Londoners is only 0.4%. We generally confirmed that increasing the complexity and incorporating important microenvironments, such as the highly polluted LU, could significantly reduce the misclassification in health burden assessments.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/88918
Item Type Article
Refereed No
Divisions Science > School of the Built Environment > Urban Living group
Science > School of the Built Environment > Organisation, People and Technology group
Science > School of the Built Environment > Energy and Environmental Engineering group
Publisher MDPI
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar