Learning vocabulary through listening: the role of vocabulary knowledge and listening proficiency

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of Learning_vocabulary_through_listening_The_role_of_vocabulary_knowledge_and_listening_proficiency.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only
[thumbnail of Supporting information.pdf]
Text - Supplemental Material
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Zhang, P. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2136-4984 and Graham, S. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7743-3977 (2020) Learning vocabulary through listening: the role of vocabulary knowledge and listening proficiency. Language Learning, 70 (4). pp. 1017-1053. ISSN 0023-8333 doi: 10.1111/lang.12411

Abstract/Summary

This study explored the impact of preexisting vocabulary knowledge (PVK) and listening proficiency on the vocabulary learning through listening of 137 Chinese learners of English, when provided with three types of oral vocabulary explanations—second language (L2), codeswitching (CS), and contrastive focus‐on‐form (CFoF)—and when no explanations (NE) were provided (extending Zhang & Graham, 2019). Listening proficiency was a more important factor influencing vocabulary learning through aural input than PVK was, with most notable gains for learners with high listening proficiency and low PVK. The CFoF approach was the most helpful for learners regardless of their PVK and listening proficiency, whereas the NE approach was the least helpful. Moreover, comparing just the CS and L2 groups, the CS approach was more helpful for lower PVK learners and for more proficient listeners than the L2 approach was. Higher PVK learners and less proficient listeners, however, benefited more from the L2 approach than from the CS approach. The study highlights the complex interplay of vocabulary knowledge, listening proficiency, and instructional conditions, factors useful to bear in mind when planning activities to enhance vocabulary learning through listening.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/88908
Identification Number/DOI 10.1111/lang.12411
Refereed Yes
Divisions Interdisciplinary Research Centres (IDRCs) > Centre for Literacy and Multilingualism (CeLM)
Arts, Humanities and Social Science > Institute of Education > Language and Literacy in Education
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar