Why does Arakawa and Schubert's convective quasi-equilibrium closure not work? Mathematical analysis and implications

[thumbnail of applyCQE.pdf]
Preview
Text
- Accepted Version

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Yano, J.-I. and Plant, B. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8808-0022 (2020) Why does Arakawa and Schubert's convective quasi-equilibrium closure not work? Mathematical analysis and implications. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 77 (4). pp. 1371-1385. ISSN 1520-0469 doi: 10.1175/jas-d-19-0165.1

Abstract/Summary

Arakawa and Schubert (1974) proposed convective quasi-equilibrium as a guiding principle for the closure of convection parameterization. However, empirical experiences from operational implementation efforts suggest that its strict application does not work well. The purpose of the present paper is to explain mathematically why this closure does not work in practice, and to suggest that problems stem from physically unrealistic assumptions. For this purpose, the closure hypothesis is examined in its original form, and without imposing a condition of a positiveness to the convective mass fluxes. The Jordan sounding with idealized large-scale forcing is used for diagnosis purposes. The question is addressed from several perspectives including the completeness of the entraining plume spectrum, and a singular vector decomposition of the interaction kernel matrix. The main problems with the quasi–equilibrium closure are traced to: (i) the relatively slow response of shallower convective modes to large-scale forcing; and, (ii) detrainment at convection top producing strong cooling and moistening. A strict application of the convective quasi-equilibrium principle leads to a singular response of shallow convection. An explicit coupling of convection with stratiform clouds would be crucial for preventing this unrealistic behavior, recognizing that the re-evaporation of detrained cloudy-air is a relatively slow process.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/87845
Identification Number/DOI 10.1175/jas-d-19-0165.1
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
Publisher American Meteorological Society
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar