Investigating the PDR process in a UK university: continuing professional development or performativity?

[thumbnail of FinalSubmissionCENTAURVERSION.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Floyd, A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2008-7831 (2019) Investigating the PDR process in a UK university: continuing professional development or performativity? Professional Development in Education (formerly Journal of In-service Education), 48 (2). pp. 315-329. ISSN 1941-5257 doi: 10.1080/19415257.2019.1696874

Abstract/Summary

Over recent years, the professional development review process has risen in importance in universities with such exercises being shown to have a positive effect on student learning, staff motivation, recruitment and retention. However, they may also be perceived as a controlling mechanism and part of a culture of ‘performativity’, which implies a lack of trust, an undermining of autonomy and a reliance on externally driven targets to ‘manage’ staff. However, there is very little published research in this area. This paper addresses this knowledge gap by drawing on data from a Leadership Foundation funded study in a UK University which included 30 interviews and a follow up survey (n=177) with both leaders and the staff they lead. The findings suggest that both leaders and staff felt that the process was potentially very important and could offer significant levels of guidance and support for professional development. However, they stressed the importance of a review structure which was adaptable, more professionally relevant, and less reliant on over ambitious target setting.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/87175
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/19415257.2019.1696874
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > Institute of Education > Improving Equity and Inclusion through Education
Publisher Taylor and Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar