Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Public-private entanglements: consultant use by local planning authorities in England

[thumbnail of Wargent et al 2019.pdf]
Preview
Wargent et al 2019.pdf - Accepted Version (435kB) | Preview
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Wargent, M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1448-9383, Parker, G. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3079-4377 and Street, E. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8987-5916 (2019) Public-private entanglements: consultant use by local planning authorities in England. European Planning Studies, 28 (1). pp. 192-210. ISSN 1469-5944 doi: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1677565

Abstract/Summary

Despite intermittent recognition of the input of private planning consultants in the UK planning system, there remains a paucity of empirical studies into their roles and influence in contemporary practice. Drawing on interviews with both public and private planners in England, this paper explores the nature of the public-private entanglements that increasingly define local planning practice. These in-clude the heterogeneity of the consultant market, the rationales employed to justify consultant use, the nature of the expertise being deployed, and the asymmetrical nature of public/private relationships. The paper argues that the demands made on the public planning system and the planners that operate it are driving teleological explanations of the use of private expertise, displaying an ambivalence to the fact that Local Planning Authorities are in a position of critical dependency with private sector consultants. In concluding, it is argued that the knowledges that underpin planning practices are increasingly shaped by the market, with the potential to un-dermine planning’s public interest purpose.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/86672
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Real Estate and Planning
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar