Information, prices and efficiency in an online betting market

[thumbnail of betting_efficiency_elaad_reade_singleton.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Elaad, G., Reade, J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8610-530X and Singleton, C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8247-8830 (2020) Information, prices and efficiency in an online betting market. Finance Research Letters, 35. 101291. ISSN 1544-6123 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2019.09.006

Abstract/Summary

We contribute to the discussion on betting market efficiency by studying the odds (or prices) set by fifty-one online bookmakers, for the result outcomes in over 16,000 association football matches in England since 2010. Adapting a methodology typically used to evaluate forecast efficiency, we test the Efficient Market Hypothesis in this context. We find odds are generally not biased when compared against actual match outcomes, both in terms of favourite-longshot or outcome types. But individual bookmakers are not efficient. Their own odds do not appear to use fully the information contained in their competitors' odds.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/86111
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.frl.2019.09.006
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Economics
Uncontrolled Keywords prediction markets, Efficient Market Hypothesis, favourite-longshot bias, forecast efficiency
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar