Managing outbreaks of invasive species: eradication vs. suppression

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Fraser, R. W., Cook, D. C., Mumford, J. D., Wilby, A. and Waage, J. K. (2006) Managing outbreaks of invasive species: eradication vs. suppression. International Journal of Pest Management, 52. pp. 261-268. ISSN 0967-0874 doi: 10.1080/09670870600795930

Abstract/Summary

A framework is developed to evaluate eradication as one of three alternative management responses to an outbreak of an invasive species: eradication, suppression or no action. This framework can be used to establish under what conditions an eradication option could provide an expected net economic benefit, and whether this net benefit exceeds that of the other two options. The eradication option is more likely to be preferred in situations where there is an immediate export benefit that is derived from eradication of the outbreak, and also the uncertainty associated with the likely success of eradication is low.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/8523
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/09670870600795930
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development
Uncontrolled Keywords Invasive species, eradication, export benefit
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar