Spies, civil liberties, and the senate: the 1975 church committee

[thumbnail of 24878642_Townley_Thesis.pdf]
Preview
Text - Thesis
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
[thumbnail of 24878642_Townley_Form.PDF]
Text - Thesis Deposit Form
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Townley, D. (2018) Spies, civil liberties, and the senate: the 1975 church committee. PhD thesis, University of Reading.

Abstract/Summary

This research examines the relationship between US public opinion and national security policy. The focus of this study is the role that public opinion played during the Year of Intelligence, the sixteen-month investigation by Congress into alleged domestic abuses by the US intelligence community. The period, between January 1975 and April 1976, saw the innermost secrets of various US intelligence agencies laid bare before the world as a result of televised public hearings and investigative journalism. The research analyses what both President Gerald R. Ford and Congress defined as public opinion, and how they used such information to shape their strategic decisions concerning national security. The study investigates the ways in which Congress responded to public opinion during the creation of the Church Committee, and how great an influence public opinion had on the objectives and methods of the Church Committee investigation. The research also assesses whether the Church Committee fulfilled its obligations the Senate and the American public and considers the criticism that some contemporaries and academics have levelled at the committee's chairman, Senator Frank Church of Idaho. Using extensive archival evidence supported by oral history interviews, the research identifies that public opinion played an important role during the Year of Intelligence and, as a consequence, national security policy. The significance of the role is clearly illustrated by the research's contrast of the failure of the Ford administration to achieve any of its strategic objectives, and the success of Congress in gaining substantial reform to congressional oversight of the intelligence community. However, the results of this study illustrate that public opinion does not dominate national security policy; it is more accurate to say that national security policy and public opinion interact in a reciprocal relationship.

Item Type Thesis (PhD)
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/83873
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > History
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar