Student access to the curriculum in an age of performativity and accountability: an examination of policy enactment

Download

Preview

Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading. | Preview

Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives

[thumbnail of RPIE paper_CENTAUR version.pdf]

Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only

Restricted to Repository staff only

Advice

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Tools

Lists

Harris, R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8606-5515, Courtney, L., Ul-Abadin, Z. and Burn, K. (2020) Student access to the curriculum in an age of performativity and accountability: an examination of policy enactment. Research Papers in Education, 35 (2). pp. 228-248. ISSN 1470-1146 doi: 10.1080/02671522.2019.1568528

Abstract/Summary

The curriculum is often the target of reform and governments use a range of accountability measures to ensure compliance. This paper examines the decisions schools in England make regarding history provision, in a period of curriculum change, and the potential consequences of these decisions. Drawing on a large, longitudinal data set, of primary and secondary material, the study examines the relationship between the number of students entered for public examination in history in England and a range of situated and material factors (Braun, Maguire and Ball, 2010). The data suggest that particular measures of accountability are effective in shaping school decision-making, but the type of school, socio-economic nature of the school intake, and students’ prior attainment are also important factors in understanding the decisions made. This does result in an inequitable access to history education; this inequity exists between different types of schools and socio-economic areas, and is also evident within schools where students with low prior attainment are less likely to be allowed to study history.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type	Article
URI	https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/81643
Identification Number/DOI	10.1080/02671522.2019.1568528
Refereed	Yes
Divisions	Arts, Humanities and Social Science > Institute of Education > Improving Equity and Inclusion through Education
Uncontrolled Keywords	policy; history education; curriculum; school decision-making
Publisher	Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics	View download statistics for this item

Download Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Deposit Details

Date Deposited:	22 Jan 2019 09:48	Date item deposited into CentAUR
Last Modified:	28 Jan 2025 02:37	Date item last modified

References

Adams, P. 2016. “Education Policy: Explaining, Framing and Forming.” Journal of Education Policy 31 (3): 290-307. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2015.1084387 Ball, S. 2003. “The Teacher's Soul and the Terrors of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 18 (2): 215-228. doi: 10.1080/0268093022000043065 Ball, S. 2015 “Education, governance and the tyranny of numbers.” Journal of Education Policy, 30 (3), 299-301. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2015.1013271 Ball, S. 2017. The Education Debate. 3rd ed. Bristol: Policy Press. Bergh, A. 2015. “Local Quality Work in an Age of Accountability – Between Autonomy and Control.” Journal of Education Policy 30 (4): 590-607. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2015.1017612 Braun, A., S. Ball, M. Maguire and K. Hoskins. 2011. “Taking Context Seriously: towards Explaining Policy Enactments in the Secondary School.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 32 (4): 585-596. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2011.601555 Braun, A., M. Maguire and S. Ball. 2010. “Policy Enactments in the UK Secondary School: Examining Policy, Practice and School Positioning.” Journal of Education Policy 25 (4): 547-560. doi: 10.1080/02680931003698544 Burn, K. and Harris, R. 2014. Historical Association Survey of History in Schools in England 2014. http://www.history.org.uk/news/news_2303.html Burn, K. and Harris, R. 2017. Historical Association Survey of History in Schools in England 2017. https://www.history.org.uk/ha-news/categories/455/news/3452/history-in-schools-2017 Cain, T., and A. Chapman. 2014. “Dysfunctional Dichotomies? Deflating Bipolar Constructions of Curriculum and Pedagogy through Case Studies from Music and History.” The Curriculum Journal 25 (1): 111–129. doi: 10.1080/09585176.2013.877396 Cannadine, D., J. Keating and N. Sheldon. 2011. The Right Kind of History. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. Connell, R. 2013. “The Neoliberal Cascade and Education: an Essay on the Market Agenda and its Consequences.” Critical Studies in Education 54 (2): 99-112. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2013.776990 Davies, P. and J. Hughes. 2009. “The Fractured Arms of Government and the Premature End of Lifelong Learning.” Journal of Education Policy 24 (5): 595- 610. doi: 10.1080/02680930903125145 Doward, J. 2017. “Wrong A-level choices prevent poorer students gaining elite university places.” The Guardian, August 14. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/aug/12/poor-students-miss-out-on-elite-universities. Field, A. 2013. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: Sage. George, D., & Mallery, M. 2010. SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.). Boston: Pearson. Goodson, I. 2010. “Times of educational change: towards an understanding of patterns of historical and cultural refraction.” Journal of Education Policy 25 (6): 767-775. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2010.508179 Griggs, J. and R. Walker. 2008. The costs of child poverty for individuals and society. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. https://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/default/files/jrf/migrated/files/2301-child-poverty-costs.pdf. Harris, R. 2013. “The place of diversity within history and the challenge of policy and curriculum.” Oxford Review of Education, 39 (3): 400-419. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2013.810551 Harris, R. and K. Burn. 2011. “Curriculum Theory, Curriculum Policy and the Problem of Ill-Disciplined Thinking.” Journal of Education Policy 26 (2): 245-261. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2010.498902 Harris, R., C. Downey, and K. Burn. 2012. “History Education in Comprehensive Schools: Using School-Level Data to Interpret National Patterns.” Oxford Review of Education 38 (4): 413-436. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2012.707614 Hirsch, E. D. 1987. Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know. New York, NY: Vintage Books. Hirsch, E. D. 1993. “The Core Knowledge Curriculum – What’s behind its success?” Educational Leadership 50 (8): 23-30. JCQ. 2016. GCSE, Project and Entry Level Trends, 2016. https://www.jcq.org.uk/examination-results/gcses/2016 Lambert, D. 2011. “Reviewing the Case for Geography, and the ‘Knowledge Turn’ in the English National Curriculum.” The Curriculum Journal 22 (2): 243-264. doi: 10.1080/09585176.2011.574991 Maguire, M., A. Braun and S. Ball. 2015. “Where You Stand Depends on Where You Sit’: The Social Construction of Policy Enactments in the (English) Secondary School.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 36 (4): 485-499. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2014.977022 Olssen, M. and M. Peters. 2005. “Neoliberalism, Higher Education and the Knowledge Economy: From the Free Market to Knowledge Capitalism.” Journal of Education Policy 20 (3): 313-345. doi: 10.1080/02680930500108718 Russell Group. 2013/14. Informed choices: A Russell Group guide to making decisions about post-16 education. https://www.russellgroup.ac.uk/media/5272/informedchoices-print.pdf. Solomon, Y. and C. Lewin. 2016. “Measuring ‘Progress’: Performativity as Both Driver and Constraint in School Innovation.” Journal of Education Policy 31 (2): 226-238. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2015.1062147 Tinsley, T. and K. Board 2017. Language trends 2016/17. Language teaching in primary and secondary schools in England: Survey report. British Council. https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/language_trends_survey_2017_0.pdf Velleman, P.F. and L. Wilkinson. 1993. “Nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio typologies are misleading.” The American Statistician 47 (1): 65-72. Wineburg, S. 2007. “Unnatural and essential: the nature of historical thinking.” Teaching History 129: 6-12. Winter, C. 2012. “School Curriculum, Globalisation and the Constitution of Policy Problems and Solutions.” Journal of Education Policy 27 (3): 295-314. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2011.609911 Young, M. 2014. “What is a Curriculum and what Can it Do?” The Curriculum Journal 25 (1): 7-13. doi: 10.1080/09585176.2014.902526

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar