Theocratic rule, native agency and transformation: post-crusade sacred landscapes in the eastern Baltic

[thumbnail of YLAN19.1 Pluskowski Eastern Baltic Pluskowski Eastern Baltic Text and captions 10dec2018.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Pluskowski, A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4494-7664, Valk, H. and Szczepański, S. (2018) Theocratic rule, native agency and transformation: post-crusade sacred landscapes in the eastern Baltic. Landscapes, 19 (1). pp. 4-24. ISSN 1466-2035 doi: 10.1080/14662035.2018.1561009

Abstract/Summary

The crusades against eastern Baltic societies from the end of the twelfth century saw the reorganisation of the conquered territories into new Christian polities - Livonia and Prussia - largely ruled by a militarised theocracy consisting of the Teutonic Order, bishops and cathedral chapters. This was accompanied by the reconfiguration of land ownership and intensification in resource exploitation aimed at sustaining the new regime, alongside the growing urban and rural populations. An ecclesiastical administration was also imposed on the conquered territories, alongside the construction of churches and monasteries, confronting native religions which attached sacred importance to natural places and cemeteries. This paper compares the transformation of sacred landscapes in Livonia and Prussia and provides an interpretation of variability in relation to theocratic authority, native and migrant populations. Encompassing the role of settlements, cemeteries and the tempo of change, the paper is situated within a new archaeological framework contextualising religious transformation in the Middle Ages. It also provides the first detailed, comparative perspective for the two regions. The landscape was not uniformly transformed and its variability, particularly the post-crusade endurance and even proliferation of native sacred sites, reflects the limits of theocratic authority and the pragmatic necessities of ruling a conquered population. That strong contrasts exist in the nature and process of Christianisation in even superficially similar areas like Livonia and Prussia should serve as a warning to resist generalising across limited data sets.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/81384
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/14662035.2018.1561009
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science > Department of Archaeology
Publisher Maney
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar