Subjective discomfort of TMS predicts reaction times differences in published studies

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of Holmes Meteyard_2018_TMS Frontiers_Manuscript.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Holmes, N. and Meteyard, L. (2018) Subjective discomfort of TMS predicts reaction times differences in published studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. 1989. ISSN 1664-1078 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01989

Abstract/Summary

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was developed thirty years ago, in part to decrease the peripheral side-effects associated with transcranial electrical stimulation (Barker, 1991). TMS has been effective in that aim, and great advances have been made over the past 30 years. TMS can still be uncomfortable and painful, however, as it stimulates excitable superficial tissue including scalp muscles and peripheral nerves (Maizey et al., 2013). This causes annoyance, pain, and muscle twitches (i.e., discomfort) that vary systematically across the scalp (Meteyard & Holmes, 2018). For this Opinion, we investigated whether the TMS-related discomfort measured in our previous work could predict the reported differences in RT in studies published in the last 10 years. For single-pulse TMS studies, differences in RT between TMS and control conditions were significantly correlated with both the mean of median ratings of muscle twitches, and the mean effect of TMS on RT from Meteyard & Holmes (2018).

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/79480
Identification Number/DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01989
Refereed Yes
Divisions Interdisciplinary Research Centres (IDRCs) > Centre for Integrative Neuroscience and Neurodynamics (CINN)
Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Clinical Language Sciences
Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Language and Cognition
Publisher Frontiers Media
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar