Two forms of realism in political theory

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Baderin, A. (2014) Two forms of realism in political theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 13 (2). pp. 132-153. ISSN 1741-2730 doi: 10.1177/1474885113483284

Abstract/Summary

This paper explores contemporary debates about the meaning and value of realism in political theory. I seek to move beyond the widespread observation that realism encompasses a diverse set of critiques and commitments, by urging that we recognize two key strands in recent realist thought. Detachment realists claim that political theory is excessively abstract and infeasible and thereby fails adequately to inform actual political decision-making. Displacement critics, on the other hand, suggest that political theory threatens or disrespects real politics. Not only are these visions of realism very different, there are also important tensions between them. I focus, in particular, on clarifying and evaluating the more complex charge that political theory displaces politics.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/79475
Identification Number/DOI 10.1177/1474885113483284
Refereed Yes
Divisions No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Publisher Springer
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar