Sampling frequency and the performance of different types of technical trading rules

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Hudson, R., McGroarty, F. and Urquhart, A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8834-4243 (2017) Sampling frequency and the performance of different types of technical trading rules. Finance Research Letters, 22. pp. 136-139. ISSN 1544-6123 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2016.12.015

Abstract/Summary

The predictive ability of technical trading rules has been studied in great detail however many papers group all technical trading rules together into one basket. We argue that there are two main types of technical trading rules, namely rules based on trend-following and mean reversion. Utilising high-frequency commodity ETF data, we show that mean-reversion based rules perform increasingly better as sampling frequencies increase and that conversely the performance of trend-following rules deteriorate at higher-frequencies. These findings are possibly related to noise created by high-frequency traders.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/79174
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.frl.2016.12.015
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar