What can repetition, reading and naming tell us about Jargon Aphasia?

Download

[thumbnail of Jargon Aphasia Nonword Error Sources_ACCEPTED.pdf]

Preview

Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading. | Preview

Advice

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Tools

Lists

Pilkington, E., Sage, K., Saddy, D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8501-6076 and Robson, H. (2019) What can repetition, reading and naming tell us about Jargon Aphasia? Journal of Neurolinguistics, 49. pp. 45-56. ISSN 0911-6044 doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.08.003

Abstract/Summary

Jargon Aphasia is an acquired language disorder characterised by high proportions of nonword error production, rendering spoken language incomprehensible. There exist two major hypotheses relating to the source of nonword error; one implicates disruption to phonological processing and the other suggests both phonological and lexical contributions. The lexical sources are described as failure in lexical retrieval followed by surrogate phonological construction, or a lexical selection error further compounded by phonological breakdown. The current study analysed nonword error patterns of ten individuals with fluent Neologistic Jargon aphasia in word repetition, reading and picture naming to gain insights into the contributions of these different sources. It was predicted that, if lexical retrieval deficits contribute to nonword production, naming would produce a greater proportion and severity of nonword errors in comparison to repetition and reading, where phonology is present and additional sub-lexical processing can support production. Both group and case series analyses were implemented to determine whether quantity and quality of nonwords differed across the three production tasks. Nonword phoneme inventories were compared against the normative phoneme distribution to explore whether phonological production takes place within a typically organised, lexically constrained system. Results demonstrated fewer nonword errors in naming and a tendency for nonwords in naming to be characterised by lower phonological accuracy. However, nonwords were, for the most part, constructed with reference to target phonological information and, generally, nonword phonological production patterns adhered to the statistical properties of the learned phonological system. While a subset of the current group demonstrated very limited lexical processing capacity which manifested as nonword errors in naming being most disrupted, overall the results suggest that nonwords are largely underpinned by some degree of successful lexical retrieval and implicate phonological sources, which manifest more severely when production is accomplished via nonlexical processing routes.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type	Article
URI	https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/78781
Identification Number/DOI	10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.08.003
Refereed	Yes
Divisions	Interdisciplinary Research Centres (IDRCs) > Centre for Literacy and Multilingualism (CeLM) Interdisciplinary Research Centres (IDRCs) > Centre for Integrative Neuroscience and Neurodynamics (CINN) Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Clinical Language Sciences
Publisher	Elsevier
Download/View statistics	View download statistics for this item

Download Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Deposit Details

Date Deposited:	28 Aug 2018 14:11	Date item deposited into CentAUR
Last Modified:	09 Jun 2024 05:00	Date item last modified

References

• Ackerman, T., & Ellis, A. W. (2007). Case study: Where do aphasic perseverations come from? Aphasiology, 21(10-11), 1018-1038. doi: 10.1080/02687030701198361 • Adlam, A. L., Patterson, K., Bozeat, S., & Hodges, J. R. (2010). The Cambridge Semantic Memory Test Battery: detection of semantic deficits in semantic dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Neurocase, 16(3), 193-207. doi: 10.1080/13554790903405693 • Baars, B. J., Motley, M. T., & MacKay, D. G. (1975). Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(4), 382-391. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80017-X • Bose, A. (2013). Phonological therapy in jargon aphasia: Effects on naming and neologisms. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48(5), 582-595. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12038 • Buckingham, H. W. (1990). Abstruse neologisms, retrieval deficits and the random generator. J Neurolinguistics, 5(2–3), 215-235. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0911-6044(90)90012-N • Buckingham, H. W. (1977). The Conduction Theory and Neologistic Jargon. Language and Speech, Vol 20, Issue 2, pp. 174 – 184. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097702000209 • Buckingham, H. W. (1981). Chapter 3 - Where Do Neologisms Come From? A2 - BROWN, JASON W Jargonaphasia (pp. 39-62), New York: Academic Press. • Buckingham, H. W., & Kertesz, A. (1976). Neologistic jargon aphasia. In R. Hoops & Y. Lebrun (Eds.), Neurolingsuistics. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger. • Butterworth, B. (1979). Hesitation and the production of verbal paraphasias and neologisms in jargon aphasia. Brain and Language, 8(2), 133-161. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(79)90046-4 • Butterworth, B. (1992). Disorders of phonological encoding. Cognition, 42(1), 261-286. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90045-J • Butterworth, B., Swallow, J., & Grimston, M. (1981). Chapter 5 - Gestures and Lexical Processes in Jargonaphasia A2 - BROWN, JASON W Jargonaphasia (pp. 113-124). New York: Academic Press. • Corbett, F., Jefferies, E., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2008). The use of cueing to alleviate recurrent verbal perseverations: Evidence from transcortical sensory aphasia. Aphasiology, 22(4), 363-382. doi: 10.1080/02687030701415245 • Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkinsm P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychol. Rev. 100, 589–608. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.589 • Davis, C. J. (2005). N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37(1), 65-70. doi: 10.3758/BF03206399 • Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychol Rev, 104(4), 801-838. • Denes, P. B. (1963). On the Statistics of Spoken English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35(6), 892-904. doi: doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1918622 • Eaton, E., Marshall, J., & Pring, T. (2010). Like deja vu all over again: Patterns of perseveration in two people with jargon aphasia. Aphasiology, 24(9), 1017-1031. doi: Pii 918865637 10.1080/02687030903249343 • Godbold, C., Robson, H., & Bose, A. (2013). Patterns of Phonological Overlap between Non-word Error and Target in Jargon Aphasia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 94, 28-29. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.011 • Goldrick, M., & Blumstein, S. E. (2006). Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: Evidence from tongue twisters. Lang Cogn Process, 21(6), 649-683. doi: 10.1080/01690960500181332 • Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi, B. (2001). Boston diagnostic aphasia examination (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. • Hanley, J. R., Dell, G. S., Kay, J., & Baron, R. (2004). Evidence for the involvement of a nonlexical route in repetition of familiar words: a comparison of single and dual route models of auditory word repetition. Cognitive neuropschology, 21(2/3/4) 147-158. • Kertesz, A., & Benson, D. F. (1970). Neologistic Jargon: A Clinicopathological Study. Cortex, 6(4), 362-386. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(70)80002-8 • Kohn, S. E., Smith, K. L., & Alexander, M. P. (1996). Differential recovery from impairment to the phonological lexicon. Brain and Language, 52(1), 129-149. doi: 10.1006/brln.1996.0007 • Marshall, J. (2006). Jargon aphasia: What have we learned? Aphasiology, 20(5), 387-410. doi: 10.1080/02687030500489946 • Moses, M. S., Nickels, L. A., & Sheard, C. (2004). Disentangling the web: Neologistic perseverative errors in jargon aphasia. Neurocase, 10(6), 452-461. doi: 10.1080/13554790490894057 • Moses, M. S., Nickels, L. A., & Sheard, C. (2007). Chips, cheeks and carols: A review of recurrent perseveration in speech production. Aphasiology, 21(10-11), 960-974. doi: 10.1080/02687030701198254 • Nozari, N., and Dell, G. (2013). How damaged brains repeat words: A computational approach. Brain and Language. 126(3), 327-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.07.005 • Nozari, N., Kitteridge, A. K., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F., (2010). Naming and repeition in aphasia: Steps, routes and frequency effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 1;63(4):541-559. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.08.001 • Olson, A., Halloran, E., & Romani, C. (2015). Target/error overlap in jargonaphasia: The case for a one-source model, lexical and non-lexical summation, and the special status of correct responses. Cortex, 73, 158-179. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.06.028 • Olson, A. C., Romani, C., & Halloran, L. (2007). Localizing the deficit in a case of jargonaphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24(2), 211-238. doi: 10.1080/02643290601137017 • Pilkington, E., Keidel, J., Kendrick, L. T., Saddy, J. D., Sage, K., & Robson, H. (2017). Sources of Phoneme Errors in Repetition: Perseverative, Neologistic, and Lesion Patterns in Jargon Aphasia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11(225). doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00225 • Robson, H., Pilkington, E., Evans, L., DeLuca, V. and Keidel, J. (2017) Phonological and semantic processing during comprehension in Wernicke’s aphasia: a N400 and Phonological Mapping Negativity study. Neuropsychologia, 100. pp. 144-154. ISSN 0028-3932 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.04.012 • Robson, H., Sage, K. and Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2012) Revealing and quantifying the impaired phonological analysis underpinning impaired comprehension in Wernicke’s aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 50 (2). pp. 276-288. ISSN 0028-3932 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.11.022 • Robson, J., Pring, T., Marshall, J., & Chiat, S. (2003). Phoneme frequency effects in jargon aphasia: a phonological investigation of nonword errors. Brain and Language, 85(1), 109-124. • Roelofs, A. (2004). Seriality of phonological encoding in naming objects and reading their names. Mem. Cognit. 32, 212–222. doi: 10.3758/BF03196853 • Schwartz, M. F., Wilshire, C. E., Gagnon, D. A., & Polansky, M. (2004). Origins of nonword phonological errors in aphasic picture naming. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21(2-4), 159-186. doi: 10.1080/02643290342000519 • Vitevitch, M. S. (2002). The Influence of Phonological Similarity Neighborhoods on Speech Production. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(4), 735-747. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.4.735

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar