Sexual dimorphism and attractiveness in Asian and White faces

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Stephen, I. D., Salter, D. L. H., Tan, K. W., Tan, C. B. Y. and Stevenson, R. J. (2018) Sexual dimorphism and attractiveness in Asian and White faces. Visual Cognition, 26 (6). pp. 442-449. ISSN 1464-0716 doi: 10.1080/13506285.2018.1475437

Abstract/Summary

Marriages between White men and Asian women are over twice as frequent as those between White women and Asian men. Recent research has proposed that this imbalance may be explained by the finding that, on average, White men are perceived as more attractive than Asian men, and Asian women are perceived as more attractive than White women, possibly because Asian faces are perceived as more feminine than White faces. Here, we explore whether Asian faces are perceived as more feminine than White faces. Thirty-five Malaysian Chinese (20 male) and 30 Australian White (12 male) participants manipulated 100 face photographs (50 Asian; 50 White; half male) on a masculinity/femininity axis to optimize attractive appearance. As predicted, White women’s faces were increased more in femininity than Asian women’s faces, and White men’s faces were feminized more than Asian men’s faces to optimize attractiveness. These findings suggest that White faces are perceived as more masculine than Asian faces.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/78178
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/13506285.2018.1475437
Refereed Yes
Divisions University of Reading Malaysia
Uncontrolled Keywords Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar