Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Comparative phylogenetic methods and the cultural evolution of medicinal plant use

[thumbnail of Cultural evolution and medicinal plants.pdf]
Preview
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Teixidor Toneu, I., Jordan, F. M. and Hawkins, J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9048-8016 (2018) Comparative phylogenetic methods and the cultural evolution of medicinal plant use. Nature Plants, 4. pp. 754-761. ISSN 2055-0278 doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0226-6

Abstract/Summary

Human life depends on plant biodiversity and the ways in which plants are used are culturally determined. Whilst anthropologists have used phylogenetic comparative methods (PCMs) to gain an increasingly sophisticated understanding of the evolution of political, religious, social, and material culture, plant use has been almost entirely neglected. Medicinal plants are of special interest because of their role in maintaining people’s health across the world. PCMs in particular, and cultural evolutionary theory in general, provide a framework in which to study the diversity of medicinal plant applications cross-culturally, and to infer changes in plant use through time. These methods can be applied to single medicinal plants as well as the entire set of plants used by a culture for medicine, and they account for the non-independence of data when testing for floristic, cultural or other drivers of plant use. With cultural, biological, and linguistic diversity under threat, gaining a deeper and broader understanding of the variation of medicinal plant use through time and space is pressing.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/78048
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Biological Sciences > Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Publisher Nature Publishing Group
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar