Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Just what is it that makes Travis's examples so different, so appealing?

[thumbnail of Just_What_Is_It_That_Makes_Traviss_Examp 2.pdf]
Restricted to Repository staff only
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Hansen, N. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5074-1075 (2018) Just what is it that makes Travis's examples so different, so appealing? In: The Philosophy of Charles Travis: Language, Thought, and Perception. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780198783916

Abstract/Summary

Odd and memorable examples are a distinctive feature of Charles Travis’s work: cases involving squash balls, soot-covered kettles, walls that emit poison gas, faces turning puce, ties made of freshly cooked linguine, and people grunting when punched in the solar plexus all figure in his arguments. One of Travis’s examples, involving a pair of situations in which the leaves of a Japanese maple tree are painted green, has even spawned its own literature consisting of attempts to explain the context sensitivity of color adjectives (“green”, e.g.). For Travis, these examples play a central role in his arguments for occasion-sensitivity, which he takes to be a pervasive feature of how we understand natural language. But how, exactly, do these examples work? My aims in this paper are to put Travis’s examples under the microscope, using recent experimental studies of Travis-style cases to raise worries about the way Travis’s cases are informally presented, and then to show how his examples can be redesigned to address those worries.

Item Type Book or Report Section
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/77448
Item Type Book or Report Section
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy
Publisher Oxford University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar