The role of transaction costs and risk aversion when selecting between one and two regimes for portfolio models

[thumbnail of Regimes 10.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Platanakis, E., Sakkas, A. and Sutcliffe, C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0187-487X (2019) The role of transaction costs and risk aversion when selecting between one and two regimes for portfolio models. Applied Economics Letters, 26 (6). pp. 516-521. ISSN 1466-4291 doi: 10.1080/13504851.2018.1486984

Abstract/Summary

Estimation of the inputs is the main problem when applying portfolio analysis, and Markov regime switching models have been shown to improve these estimates. We investigate whether the use of two regime models remains superior across a range of values of risk aversion and transaction costs, in the presence of skewness and kurtosis and no short sales. Our results for US data suggest that, due to differences in their risk preferences and transactions costs, most retail investors may prefer to use one regime models, while investment banks may prefer to use two regime models.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/77114
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/13504851.2018.1486984
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar