Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

The binding site distance test score: a robust method for the assessment of predicted protein binding sites

[thumbnail of BDT_Roche_Techner_McGuffin_v1.3.pdf]
Preview
BDT_Roche_Techner_McGuffin_v1.3.pdf - Accepted Version (232kB) | Preview
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Roche, D. B., Tetchner, S. J. and McGuffin, L. J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4501-4767 (2010) The binding site distance test score: a robust method for the assessment of predicted protein binding sites. Bioinformatics, 26 (22). pp. 2920-2921. ISSN 1460-2059 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq543

Abstract/Summary

We propose a novel method for scoring the accuracy of protein binding site predictions – the Binding-site Distance Test (BDT) score. Recently, the Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) has been used to evaluate binding site predictions, both by developers of new methods and by the assessors for the community wide prediction experiment – CASP8. Whilst being a rigorous scoring method, the MCC does not take into account the actual 3D location of the predicted residues from the observed binding site. Thus, an incorrectly predicted site that is nevertheless close to the observed binding site will obtain an identical score to the same number of nonbinding residues predicted at random. The MCC is somewhat affected by the subjectivity of determining observed binding residues and the ambiguity of choosing distance cutoffs. By contrast the BDT method produces continuous scores ranging between 0 and 1, relating to the distance between the predicted and observed residues. Residues predicted close to the binding site will score higher than those more distant, providing a better reflection of the true accuracy of predictions. The CASP8 function predictions were evaluated using both the MCC and BDT methods and the scores were compared. The BDT was found to strongly correlate with the MCC scores whilst also being less susceptible to the subjectivity of defining binding residues. We therefore suggest that this new simple score is a potentially more robust method for future evaluations of protein-ligand binding site predictions.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/7710
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Biological Sciences > Biomedical Sciences
Interdisciplinary centres and themes > Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research (ICMR)
Publisher Oxford University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar