Systemic risk and bank size

[thumbnail of VZ - JIMF v40 centaur.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Varotto, S. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5328-5327 and Zhao, L. (2018) Systemic risk and bank size. Journal of International Money and Finance, 82. pp. 45-70. ISSN 0261-5606 doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2017.12.002

Abstract/Summary

In this paper we analyse firm level systemic risk for US and European banks from 2004 to 2012. We observe that common systemic risk indicators are primarily driven by firm size which implies an overriding concern for “too-big-to-fail” institutions. However, smaller banks may still pose considerable systemic threats, as exemplified by the Northern Rock debacle in 2007. By introducing a simple standardisation, we obtain new risk measures that often prove to be superior predictors of financial distress during the 2007-2009 subprime crisis. We conclude that the new measures could be a valuable addition to the existing indicators employed in Basel III to identify systemically important banks.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/74559
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2017.12.002
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar